Prohibition of Reading Someone Else’s Writing or Letters - And How It Relates to Today’s Digital Resources Introduction Among the refined etiquettes taught in Islam is respect for others' privacy. This includes refraining from reading another person’s writings, letters, or personal notes without their permission. Scholars have discussed this issue extensively, drawing evidence from hadith, the practice of the Salaf, and juristic principles. Foundational Evidence from the Hadith The foundation for this etiquette is based on the narration attributed to the Prophet ﷺ: “Whoever looks into his brother’s writing without his permission is as though he is looking into Hellfire.” This narration has been reported from Ibn ʿAbbās (رضي الله عنهما) through various chains. However, scholars of hadith have classified it as weak (ḍaʿīf). Abu Dawud stated that all its routes are weak, Abu Hatim described it as munkar, and Ibn Hajar and al-Albani also declared its chain weak. Despite its weaknesses,...
As the caravan ground to a halt at dusk, the day’s journey had left the four men weary and hungry. They gathered around the crackling fire, drawn together by necessity but divided by a wall of language. Each man hailed from a different land—there was a Persian, an Arab, a Turk, and a Greek from the Sultanate of Rûm. Their clothes were worn, their faces marked by hardship, and their spirits chilled by the biting evening wind. None of them exchanged a word as they settled in, for the languages they spoke were foreign to each other.
The silence, however, was soon broken by a kind-hearted man who had observed their plight. Taking pity on the four, he approached them with a small sum of money, offering it with a simple instruction: “Buy something to fill your bellies.” With that, he disappeared into the night, leaving them in stunned silence.
The Persian, eager to make a decision, spoke up first, his voice filled with determination. "We should buy angur," he declared. His eyes sparkled with the thought of what he desired. Angur, the Persian word for grapes, was what he sought to satisfy his hunger.
The Arab, overhearing the suggestion, misunderstood the word and scowled. “What is this nonsense about anab? I don’t want that. I want grapes!” He wasn’t sure what angur meant, but the way the Persian said it rubbed him the wrong way, and in his frustration, he voiced his desire for something simple—grapes, nothing else.
The Turk, who had been quietly observing, was now caught up in the growing tension. He too, had heard the word uzum, the Turkish name for grapes, but the whole conversation was becoming increasingly confusing. His voice joined the fray as he chimed in, “Stop this madness about uzum! Let’s just get grapes, for heaven’s sake!” His frustration echoed through the group as the disagreement continued to spiral.
Lastly, the Greek, who had been silent up to that point, finally couldn’t hold back any longer. He too had his own word for grapes—stafilia—and he was adamant about his choice. “You’re all wrong! Let’s agree to buy stafilia—the best choice for everyone!” The Greek’s irritation was clear as he joined in the growing argument.
What began as a simple conversation about food quickly escalated into an all-out quarrel. Each man, convinced that the others were dismissing his suggestion, raised his voice in anger. What was once an offer of kindness—a gift of food—had now turned into a heated argument. Fists soon replaced words, and the fire crackled on, oblivious to the absurdity of the dispute. Their heated exchanges filled the air as each man continued to fight for his version of what should be bought. Yet none of them realized that they were all, in fact, asking for the same thing: grapes.
Amidst the chaos, a quiet figure emerged from the shadows. It was an old sage, his steps measured and calm. He observed the men, a small smile playing on his lips as he watched the confusion unfold. He waited patiently for the perfect moment to intervene, knowing full well that it was not anger but misunderstanding that had fueled the fight.
With a quiet but firm voice, the sage approached the men and separated them from each other. “Enough!” he commanded. The men froze, their faces flushed with both frustration and embarrassment. The sage’s gaze was calm, but his words held the weight of wisdom. “What is this quarrel about?”
One by one, each man began to explain his side of the story, their voices rising in protest. The sage listened intently, his eyes glimmering with understanding as he took in their words. He then did something none of them expected: he spoke to each of them in their own language. And to their astonishment, the sage revealed the truth: each man had been asking for the same thing—grapes.
The realization dawned on them like a wave of relief. They were not so different after all. The men, humbled by the revelation, gathered their money and handed it to the sage, who smiled knowingly. He returned shortly with a bag full of fresh, sweet grapes. The men, now sharing the same understanding, sat down together in silence, the warmth of the fire and the sweetness of the grapes melting away the tension between them.
For once, words had failed them, but the grapes had succeeded where nothing else could. As they ate in silence, something unspoken yet profound passed between them—a bond formed not by language or fists, but by mutual understanding.
Lessons for Work-Life and Business
1. Communication is Crucial: Miscommunication can quickly turn collaboration into conflict. In any professional setting, especially when working with people from different backgrounds or cultures, clear communication is vital. Without it, we risk wasting energy on misunderstandings rather than moving forward.
2. Seek Understanding Before Judging: The men in the story assumed the worst of one another without pausing to clarify their intentions. In a business environment, it’s essential to take the time to understand colleagues’ perspectives before jumping to conclusions. Doing so not only prevents unnecessary conflict but often leads to better, more productive outcomes.
3. Mediation and Leadership Solve Conflict: The sage’s role in the story highlights the importance of a mediator or leader who can step in to resolve disputes. A leader who can listen attentively, understand all sides, and guide the team toward a solution is invaluable in any organization. Their ability to foster cooperation and maintain peace often determines the success of the group.
Corporate Wisdom: The Man Who Wanted a Tattoo
Comments
Post a Comment